Tuesday, 15 October 2013

TPACK explained from track.org


TPACK Explained

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) attempts to identify the nature of knowledge required by teachers for technology integration in their teaching, while addressing the complex, multifaceted and situated nature of teacher knowledge. The TPACK framework extends Shulman’s idea of Pedagogical Content Knowledge.

The Seven Components of TPACK

TPACK Image (rights free)
TPACK Image (rights free). Click to learn more about how to use this image in your own works.
At the heart of the TPACK framework, is the complex interplay of three primary forms of knowledge: Content (CK), Pedagogy (PK), and Technology (TK). The TPACK approach goes beyond seeing these three knowledge bases in isolation. The TPACK goes further by emphasizing the new kinds of knowledge that lie at the intersections between them, representing four more knowledge bases teachers applicable to teaching with technology: Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), Technological Content Knowledge (TCK), Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), and the intersection of all three circles, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK).
Effective technology integration for pedagogy around specific subject matter requires developing sensitivity to the dynamic, transactional relationship between these components of knowledge situated in unique contexts. Individual teachers, grade-level, school-specific factors, demographics, culture, and other factors ensure that every situation is unique, and no single combination of content, technology, and pedagogy will apply for every teacher, every course, or every view of teaching.
  • Content Knowledge (CK) – “Teachers’ knowledge about the subject matter to be learned or taught. The content to be covered in middle school science or history is different from the content to be covered in an undergraduate course on art appreciation or a graduate seminar on astrophysics… As Shulman (1986) noted, this knowledge would include knowledge of concepts, theories, ideas, organizational frameworks, knowledge of evidence and proof, as well as established practices and approaches toward developing such knowledge” (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).
  • Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) – “Teachers’ deep knowledge about the processes and practices or methods of teaching and learning. They encompass, among other things, overall educational purposes, values, and aims. This generic form of knowledge applies to understanding how students learn, general classroom management skills, lesson planning, and student assessment.” (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).
  • Technology Knowledge (TK) – Knowledge about certain ways of thinking about, and working with technology, tools and resources. and working with technology can apply to all technology tools and resources. This includes understanding information technology broadly enough to apply it productively at work and in everyday life, being able to recognize when information technology can assist or impede the achievement of a goal, and being able continually adapt to changes in information technology (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).
  • Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) – “Consistent with and similar to Shulman’s idea of knowledge of pedagogy that is applicable to the teaching of specific content. Central to Shulman’s conceptualization of PCK is the notion of the transformation of the subject matter for teaching. Specifically, according to Shulman (1986), this transformation occurs as the teacher interprets the subject matter, finds multiple ways to represent it, and adapts and tailors the instructional materials to alternative conceptions and students’ prior knowledge. PCK covers the core business of teaching, learning, curriculum, assessment and reporting, such as the conditions that promote learning and the links among curriculum, assessment, and pedagogy” (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).
  • Technological Content Knowledge (TCK) – “An understanding of the manner in which technology and content influence and constrain one another. Teachers need to master more than the subject matter they teach; they must also have a deep understanding of the manner in which the subject matter (or the kinds of representations that can be constructed) can be changed by the application of particular technologies. Teachers need to understand which specific technologies are best suited for addressing subject-matter learning in their domains and how the content dictates or perhaps even changes the technology—or vice versa” (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).
  • Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK) – “An understanding of how teaching and learning can change when particular technologies are used in particular ways. This includes knowing the pedagogical affordances and constraints of a range of technological tools as they relate to disciplinarily and developmentally appropriate pedagogical designs and strategies” (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).
  • Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) – “Underlying truly meaningful and deeply skilled teaching with technology, TPACK is different from knowledge of all three concepts individually. Instead, TPACK is the basis of effective teaching with technology, requiring an understanding of the representation of concepts using technologies; pedagogical techniques that use technologies in constructive ways to teach content; knowledge of what makes concepts difficult or easy to learn and how technology can help redress some of the problems that students face; knowledge of students’ prior knowledge and theories of epistemology; and knowledge of how technologies can be used to build on existing knowledge to develop new epistemologies or strengthen old ones” (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).

History and Ownership TPACK

TPACK is not a brand new idea, nor is it owned by anyone. A range of other scholars have argued that that knowledge about technology cannot be treated as context-free, and that good teaching requires an understanding of how technology relates to the pedagogy and content. The TPACK framework is gaining popularity amongst researchers and scholars. This makes tracking the progress of TPACK difficult, but for those getting started, the seminal description of TPACK (by that particular name) can be found in Mishra & Koehler, 2006.
Many people continue to develop the TPACK framework conceptually, theoretically, and empirically. Check out the TPACK Library section for more information.

Learning More about TPACK

This document is meant to be a gentle introduction to the TPACK framework, you can learn more by exploring the rest of the tpack.org website, or by clicking on the TPACK Academy section of the site.

References

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Thursday, 16 May 2013

Academic Writing Lesson 5




2nd Year Academic Writing Lesson 5              Thursday 16th May 2013      TODAYS LESSON


DRAFT 1 is DUE TODAY Please submit your Microsoft Word File to the TEACHERS FOLDER >> bgallagh >> Report 2 and print a paper copy for class. The teacher will advise you on progress and improvements.
Ø  Submit your file to TEACHERS FOLDER >> bgallagh >> 2nd Year Writing >>Report 2
Thursday Period 1
           Thursday Period 2          
12011234-W3-20-01-2
12011234-W3-08-01-2

Ø  Simple Dictation – around 42 words              “Chelsea”            (15 minutes)
Ø  Discussion on Essay 1. Use your Reading for Content and Structure Worksheets from your little booklet.                                                            (15-30 minutes)
Ø  Essay Format and Paragraph Format
o   Opening paragraph
o   Body Paragraphs
o   Closing Paragraph
Ø  Save your 1st draft file to your USB and the server.
Work on improving it for your next 2nd draft.
Ø  HOMEWORK –RESEARCH MORE and BUILD YOUR FINISHED ESSAY



Dictation May 16th            
Chelsea
REMOVED 
Retrieved (May 16th, 2013) from http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22445388



FYA - Format for Submissions remains the same
11011xxx – Mao Suzukia
June 14th, 2012
Essay 2, Draft 1.
Mr. Gallagher

“The average age of Japan's population is increasing. What are the main problems facing Japanese society because of this?”



TODAY
PEER REVIEW – Read Essays & Check Overall
CLOSING PARAGRAPH – (paragraph 5)
This final paragraph should:
Ø Restate the thesis statement
Ø Review the main points in different words
Ø Bring the essay to a satisfactory end with 1 of these:
o  summary
o  Conclusion
o  Prediction
o  Evaluation
n     NB: It should NOT contain new information or quotes.





Aging Society NOTES FROM EARLIER LESSONS
Introductionstatistics: current and future projections total population figuresaverage age of populationbreakdown of working populationcausesmain problems
Cause 1: Declining birthrate statisticsincrease in working women cost of raising childrenchildcare facilities and childcare leaveincreased pressure on social welfare system
Cause 2: Increase in longevitybetter health care and education advances in medical science
Problem 1: Pension issuesdecreasing working populationincreasing number of people on pensionsdecreasing number of contributors to pension funds
Problem 2: Social welfare issuesincrease in elderly peopleshortage of nursing homes and care workersnuclear family and change in role of family vis-à-vis looking after elderly lonely deathmigration of younger generations from rural areas



FORMAT and ESSAY EXAMPLE
11011xxx – Mao Suzuki
May 6th, 2013
Essay 1, Draft 1.
Mr B. Gallagher


The average age of Japan's population is increasing. What are the main problems facing Japanese society because of this?


The main problems facing Japanese society are problem one - blah blah blah, problem 2 blah blah blah, problem 3 blah blah blah and problem 4 blah blah blah. The central causes of these issues as explained by Oe (2006) are that The children of the transitional generation, the post-transitional generation, have tended to delay marriage, have left home after becoming financially independent of their parents. Another factor proposed is that swomen of this generation generally choose to maintain their working career.” (Oe, 2006). and explain, explain, explain.
Topic Sentence introduces the paragraph and gives the reader a clear idea of what the paragraph is about. I should enter a relevant quote like this “The children of the transitional generation, the post-transitional generation, have tended to delay marriage” (Oe, 2006) With the citation of family name and date written in parenthesis. I then Explain what this information is meaning and continue my paragraph with other ideas if required. Each idea I should introduce, insert the evidence and then explain


http://coe21-policy.sfc.keio.ac.jp/ja/wp/WP89.pdf


 





My reference page is a separate page from my writing

References


Oe, M. (2006) Problems and Implications of Japan's Aging Society for Future Urban Developments. Policy and Governance Working Paper Series No. 89 from “Policy Innovation Initiative: Human Security Research in Japan and Asia”, Keio University, Japan, p13. Retrieved (May 17th, 2012) from
http://coe21-policy.sfc.keio.ac.jp/ja/
wp/WP89.pdf

Oe, M. (2006) Problems and Implications of Japan's Aging Society for Future Urban Developments. Policy and Governance Working Paper Series No. 89 from “Policy Innovation Initiative: Human Security Research in Japan and Asia”, Keio University, Japan, p13. Retrieved (May 17th, 2012) from http://coe21-policy.sfc.keio.ac.jp/ja/wp/WP89.pdf

Oe, M. (2006) Problems and Implications of Japan's Aging Society for Future Urban Developments. Policy and Governance Working Paper Series No. 89 from “Policy Innovation Initiative: Human Security Research in Japan and Asia”, Keio University, Japan, p13. Retrieved (May 17th, 2012) from http://coe21-policy.sfc.keio.ac.jp/ja/wp/WP89.pdf